It’s Time for Real Healing

What follows, my precious grace brethren, is said in and through Love.  Please hear it as the heartfelt plea of subjective healing that I intend it to be.


When one is delivered out from under a religiously oppressive system, there are countless traumas that, if we are not careful, are carried into the next phase of our respective journeys.  That pain, if left unresolved, distorts our perceptions and pollutes the Living Water with our hurt as we pour Love out to others.  It permeates our conversation, prefacing the articulation of our beliefs more so on what we DO NOT belief than on what we DO belief.  Exhausted by the us-vs-them attitude that saturated the religion we fled, we have at times functioned with the same sense of false superiority and elitism of the very systems we escaped, merely replacing ‘sinners’ for ‘the evangelical church’ in the ‘them’ column.


As an academic, I can appreciate the importance of words and debate in articulating ideas and theological concepts.  The restoration of the true Gospel message necessitates it.  But what I have at times observed as I peruse the grace wing of social media, far more frequently than I can number, is unresolved trauma wearing a false mask of freedom.


This us-vs-them mindset isn’t limited to grace vs religion either.  It also expresses itself in the drawing of fictive lines in and among the grace community too.  Again, I know distinctions are necessary.  But when those distinctions intended to take down walls result in the building of bigger and strong ones, we’re doing the Gospel wrong.


I know the institutional church hurt you.  It has hurt everyone at one time or another.  But let’s not lose sight of the purpose of our freedom: to free others from the veil clouding their awareness of their true identity.  We have all been objectively healed through Jesus Christ.  Let’s now commit to living subjectively healed too.


I love you.



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sometimes Certainty is the Greatest Sin of All

Image
One of the more offensive beliefs espoused by western evangelicalism (and there are many) is the notion that all expressions of the Christian faith preceding it - Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Reformed, et al - were in such gross and debauched error as to render them outside the familial participation of Jesus Christ and indeed worshippers of ‘another Jesus’ altogether.  They espouse this without really considering the ramifications of what they are saying.  If these traditional veins are indeed disconnected from the one true Vine of the church, that would mean that the assembled family of God was absent from the earth for over a thousand years.  Taking it a step further in logical progression, it would be asserting that all of the voices informing our current understanding of the nature of God and His Church are irrelevant as why would we rely on those worshipping ‘another Jesus’ for guidance of any kind?!  So that would mean… The doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement which evangelica
Read more

Jesus is THE Lens!

Image
Like most people, I suppose, most of the criticisms leveled at me are, if I admit it, quite fair. Am I too quick to argue and defend my ideas rather than listen? Sure. Do I have a — completely undeserved — aristocratic bent from time to time? Yes, I own that. Do I love words to such an excessive degree that I frequently use far too many of them to make my point when fewer would do perfectly well? Ok…ouch! But yes, this is 100% true. It all the more shocks me then that the criticism most often charged against me is not at all true: “Matt, you’re just cherry picking scripture to make God in your image rather than allowing yourself to be confirmed to His.” The accusation is indeed so inaccurate that I, perhaps naively, wonder if it is because I have not adequately explained myself. So let me give it a whirl… ALL SCRIPTURE [γράφω - graphē] IS INSPIRED (literally ‘god-breathed’) is a far cry from equal, inerrant, infallible, or universally applicable. Scripture never bestows those a
Read more

Deconstructing Too Far

“Deconstruction”, when done correctly, is a refiner’s fire burning away that which is faulty or harmful, a gardener’s pruning cutting off those elements contributing to pain and death.  It should never consume the whole nor should it attempt to disconnect the branches from the vine.   While much needs removed, much warrants preservation.  Indeed, like pulling weeds from among the flowers, the purpose of subtracting the faulty is to enable the healthy multiplication of the pure.   A deconstruction process that burns the whole edifice to the ground isn’t healthy and it isn’t helpful.  It’s a form of mass suicide that, by inflicting the same fate on the wheat and the chaff alike, results in the same end as would have been obtained had we never deconstructed at all: misery and death.  (Note: I’m aware there are other, far better terms for the healthy form of ‘deconstruction’.  But I am equally aware that this is the word most commonly used and have adopted it above for the sake of clarity.
Read more